PR Validation Report: {number}

PR Validation Report: #{number}【免费下载链接】ArchonThe first open-source harness builder for AI coding. Make AI coding deterministic and repeatable.项目地址: https://gitcode.com/GitHub_Trending/archon3/ArchonTitle: {PR title}URL: {PR URL}Branch: {head} → {base}Files: {count} changed ({additions} -{deletions})Validation Date: {ISO timestamp}Verdict: {APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / NEEDS_DISCUSSION}{2-3 sentence executive summary. Be direct: is this PR ready to merge?}头部数据全部来自 gh pr view 的 JSON 输出第 3 节执行摘要要求**直截了当**回答“这个 PR 现在能合并吗”。 ### 5.2 Bug Confirmation 证据表 markdown | Claim | Confirmed on Main? | Fixed on Feature? | Evidence | |-------|--------------------|--------------------|----------| | {claim 1} | YES/NO | YES/NO | {screenshot refs or code refs} | | {claim 2} | YES/NO | YES/NO | {screenshot refs or code refs} |这是第 4.1 节四条证据链的表格化呈现Evidence 列必须给出可追溯的截图引用或代码引用而非笼统描述。5.3 Code Review Summary 与修复质量评分### Main Branch (Pre-Fix) {Brief summary from code-review-main.md — was the bug evident in code?} ### Feature Branch (Post-Fix) {Brief summary from code-review-feature.md — is the fix correct and optimal?} **Fix Quality Score**: {n}/5其中 feature 分支的评审结论可对应上游 archon-validate-pr-code-review-feature.md 中的 Fix Quality 表格——该表按 Correctness、Completeness、Simplicity、Safety、Patterns 五个维度各打 1–5 分并取平均正是这里{n}/5的来源。5.4 E2E Testing Summary 与修复置信度模板按测试是否执行提供了两个分支### Main Branch (Bug Reproduction) {Brief summary from e2e-main.md — was the bug visible in the UI?} ### Feature Branch (Fix Verification) {Brief summary from e2e-feature.md — is the fix verified in the UI?} **Fix Confidence**: HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW当classify-testability判定为code_review_only时报告改用_E2E testing was skipped — this PRs changes are not UI-visible. Validation based on code review only._Fix Confidence与上游 archon-validate-pr-e2e-feature.md 中的“Reproduction Confidence / Fix Confidence”字段一致后者还会附带“如果 agent-browser 连接失败跳过 E2E 并仅基于代码评审写结论”的降级路径。5.5 Screenshots 对照表| Screenshot | Description | |------------|-------------| | e2e-main-01-initial.png | {what it shows} | | e2e-feature-01-initial.png | {what it shows — compare with main} |截图命名约定e2e-main-*/e2e-feature-*由两个 E2E 命令在运行时按e2e-{branch}-{N}-{step}.png生成报告只需按相同前缀配对展示“修复前 vs 修复后”。5.6 Issues、Regressions 与正向反馈## Issues Found ### Must Fix Before Merge {CRITICAL or HIGH issues from any review stage. If none, say None.} ### Should Fix (Non-Blocking) {MEDIUM issues — recommended but not blocking. If none, say None.} ### Minor / Suggestions {LOW issues — nice to have. If none, say None.} ## Regressions {Any new issues introduced by the fix, or None found.} ## Whats Done Well {Positive observations — good patterns, clean code, thorough fix}这里的严重度分级CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW与 feature 代码评审命令中的问题分级体系保持一致保证多节点产出的口径统一。Whats Done Well的存在则确保报告不只输出负面问题也记录值得保留的实践。5.7 最终 Recommendation## Recommendation **{APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / NEEDS_DISCUSSION}** {Final paragraph: clear recommendation with reasoning. If REQUEST_CHANGES, list the specific changes needed. If NEEDS_DISCUSSION, describe what needs to be discussed.}三种结论各自的落笔要求被明确区分REQUEST_CHANGES 必须列出具体修改项NEEDS_DISCUSSION 必须说明需要讨论的内容。5.8 可选操作向 PR 发布精简评论当裁决明确时命令提供将浓缩摘要发布到 PR 的 bash 片段PR_NUMBER$(cat $ARTIFACTS_DIR/.pr-number | tr -d \n) gh pr comment $PR_NUMBER --body $(cat COMMENT ## Archon PR Validation Report **Verdict**: {APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES} ### Summary {2-3 sentence summary} ### Bug Confirmation | Claim | Main | Feature | |-------|------|---------| | {claim} | {status} | {status} | ### Issues {List any must-fix issues, or No blocking issues found.} --- _Validated by archon-validate-pr workflow_ COMMENT )【免费下载链接】ArchonThe first open-source harness builder for AI coding. Make AI coding deterministic and repeatable.项目地址: https://gitcode.com/GitHub_Trending/archon3/Archon创作声明：本文部分内容由AI辅助生成（AIGC），仅供参考